2S or 1N?
#1
Posted 2008-October-21, 22:57
S: Q9X
H: Q8X
D: QT9X
C: KXX
PD opened 1S, right hand passed, playing 2/1 with the above hand, what do you bid? 2S or 1N?
I choose 1N due to the balanced hand with Queen and 8,9, but Pd thinks 2S much better, which I dont agree.
Your opinion?
THanks in advance.
Hongjun
#2
Posted 2008-October-21, 23:00
I don't like the soft values and the shape, so i'll settle for a simple 2♠ and accept any game try offered, suggesting 3NT along the way if possible.
#3
Posted 2008-October-21, 23:05
Just support with support.
#4
Posted 2008-October-21, 23:19
rogerclee, on Oct 22 2008, 12:05 AM, said:
Just support with support.
ditto
#5
Posted 2008-October-21, 23:57
rogerclee, on Oct 21 2008, 09:05 PM, said:
Just support with support.
No duh. You can get to 3N later if its right.
#6
Posted 2008-October-22, 00:19
Sean
#8
Posted 2008-October-22, 06:02
your reasons, why you did choose to bid 1NT instead
of 2S are valid reasons, so your bid was fine.
Of course I assume, that you did also decide at this point,
what to bid, if openers 2nd bid was still on the 2 level,
correcting to 2S / passing 2S.
If you go into a tank after 2C, 2D, 2H or 2S, the bid was
...
In the end you have to discuss this with partner, because
it is a style thing, looking at the responses may tell you, that
this action would be taken only by a small minority, but this
does not make the bid bad.
I would have gone with a constructive 2S raise, since this
showes 3 card support, 7/8-10HCP, which is more or less
what I have, but 1 NT can work as well.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2008-October-22, 06:13
#10
Posted 2008-October-22, 08:29
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2008-October-22, 08:39
rogerclee, on Oct 22 2008, 01:05 AM, said:
Just support with support.
Agree.
You could bid 1NT if you had a 6 count with the same shape for the purpose of slowing partner down, as he is less likely to make a game try after a preference to 2♠ than after a direct raise.
#12
Posted 2008-October-22, 08:45
#13
Posted 2008-October-22, 08:59
#14
Posted 2008-October-22, 11:22
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#15
Posted 2008-October-22, 12:00
I belong to the constructive raisers (8-10(11)), so with that agreement a direct 2♠ is best. If I give preference to spades later, it would show either 5-7 with 3 or 6-9(10) with 2.
As an aside, what do the Acolites (weak NT) bid with that hand? 2♦ to cater for a balanced 15-17 opposite?
Roland
#16
Posted 2008-October-22, 12:21
A forcing NT does not promise a balanced hand in 2/1, so why would you suppress your support? If partner makes another call, you can always bid NT to show a flattish hand with 3 card support.
#17
Posted 2008-October-22, 12:21
#18
Posted 2008-October-22, 13:41
#19
Posted 2008-October-22, 13:44
- hrothgar
#20
Posted 2008-October-22, 14:11
I would normally bid 1NT with this hand but I usually play a four-card major system.
I would be tempted to bid 1NT though even in a five-card major system. I wouldn't criticize my partner for bidding either 1NT or 2♠ with this hand.
I think there are many auctions where you can get back to spades after 1NT especially if partner is aware that you might bid 1NT with this sort of hand.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon