Preempt Decision Part Three!
#1
Posted 2008-March-29, 01:27
IMPs, Fourth Seat, Red vs White
♠A ♥AQJTxx ♦Axx ♣xxx
(P)-1♠-(5♦)-?
I thought this decision was auto, but there was some discussion about it.
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-29, 01:30
rogerclee, on Mar 29 2008, 02:27 AM, said:
lol.
Anyways I double them.
#3
Posted 2008-March-29, 13:45
About 40 years ago when I was young enough to have promise I had the pleasure to play a Los Angeles Bridge Week pair event with John Swanson. With a problem somewhat like this one I reckoned we were safe at the five level and I bid. We made the contract but John, whose mood at the table normally ranged from facetious to wryly humorous for once didn't hide his frustration and mentioned a rather obvious principle that I have not forgotten. "Look at how many tricks you have on defense."
#4
Posted 2008-March-29, 20:48
rogerclee, on Mar 29 2008, 02:27 AM, said:
IMPs, Fourth Seat, Red vs White: ♠A ♥AQJTxx ♦Axx ♣xxx
(P)-1♠-(5♦)-?
I thought this decision was auto, but there was some discussion about it.
IMO 5♥ = 10, 6♥ = 9. _X = 8
I agree with JLall and ceeb that that even pclayton is unlikely to make 5♦ but I feel like gambling that we can make 5♥ or 6♥ and, on a good day, we may get a shot at 6♦ or 7♦
#6
Posted 2008-March-30, 10:07
5H for me. The temptation of 1430 is just too alluring (and likely). Put it this way. If you don't bid 5H here with this 4 loser hand, when will you ever do it?
Justin has seen my green preempts too many times and he's expecting 1100.
#7
Posted 2008-March-30, 10:32
pclayton, on Mar 30 2008, 11:07 AM, said:
Yes, on a hand with less defense, e.g. Kx KQJ10xxx x Axx I would.
- hrothgar
#8
Posted 2008-March-30, 10:57
pclayton, on Mar 30 2008, 10:07 AM, said:
5H for me. The temptation of 1430 is just too alluring (and likely). Put it this way. If you don't bid 5H here with this 4 loser hand, when will you ever do it?
Justin has seen my green preempts too many times and he's expecting 1100.
Partner will hardly ever raise 5♥ to 6♥. In fact, when he does, you should probably bid 7♥.
#9 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-30, 11:38
pclayton, on Mar 30 2008, 11:07 AM, said:
not really, I'm just expecting +???? which is better than going minus.
#10
Posted 2008-March-30, 11:41
#11 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-30, 11:56
pclayton, on Mar 30 2008, 11:07 AM, said:
This is why I'll never understand losers. To me it looks like I have 3 clubs, 2 diamonds, and like half a heart loser...
#12
Posted 2008-March-30, 14:22
cherdano, on Mar 30 2008, 11:57 AM, said:
pclayton, on Mar 30 2008, 10:07 AM, said:
5H for me. The temptation of 1430 is just too alluring (and likely). Put it this way. If you don't bid 5H here with this 4 loser hand, when will you ever do it?
Justin has seen my green preempts too many times and he's expecting 1100.
Partner will hardly ever raise 5♥ to 6♥. In fact, when he does, you should probably bid 7♥.
I agree that I would rather bid 6♥ than 5♥ if I were going to bid, but I double.
#13
Posted 2008-March-30, 22:27
#14
Posted 2008-March-30, 22:38
Ira C.... just spent ten minutes explaining to me to take a profit against preempts......I hope this is what he meant but..any error is mine.
#15
Posted 2008-March-31, 10:08
Jlall, on Mar 30 2008, 09:56 AM, said:
pclayton, on Mar 30 2008, 11:07 AM, said:
This is why I'll never understand losers. To me it looks like I have 3 clubs, 2 diamonds, and like half a heart loser...
I don't think it's unreasonable to put RHO on 8 here. Pard is stiff or LHO doesn't have one to lead.
The ♣'s and the ♥K look like losers to me. The diamonds don't. I could be wrong.
Hell I was even wrong three times last week.
#16
Posted 2008-March-31, 10:12
- hrothgar
#17
Posted 2008-March-31, 10:13